← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26273/2022bail granted

Kailash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-22Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26273 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2020 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani ====================================================== KAILASH YADAV SON OF RAMPRIT YADAV R/O VILLAGEVISHANPUR, P.S.- SAHARGHAT, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhav Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The present bail application has been filed in terms of the liberty granted to the petitioner by order dated 05.01.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 45375 of 2021 to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charges against the petitioner have been framed on 31.03.2022 vide Annexure-3 to the bail application.

Since the charges against the petitioner have been framed, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26273 of 2022(2) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 120 of 2020, subject to the condition that if the learned court below comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner then in that event the learned court below shall forthwith cancel the bail bond of the petitioner by recording reasons.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T