← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29896/2024allowed

Nibha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-13Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29896 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2023 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Nibha Devi Wife Of Jaswendra Muni @ Jaswindar Muni Resident Of Village - Badiya, P.S. - Gogari (PAURA), District - Khagaria 2.

Sumitra Devi Wife Of Nandan Muni @ Srinandan Muni @ Shiro Muni Resident Of Village - Badiya, P.S. - Gogari (PAURA), District - Khagaria 3.

Shiro Muni @ Nandan Muni @ Srinandan Muni Son Of Ramdhan Muni Resident Of Village - Badiya, P.S. - Gogari (PAURA), District - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29896 of 2024(6) dt.13-09-2024 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioners are in-laws of the deceased. He further submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and have been languishing in custody since 05.01.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Gogri (Paura) P.S. Case No. 136 of 2023.

7. However, the petitioners are directed to remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court below.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T