Usha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23042 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2018 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger ====================================================== 1.

Usha Devi, aged about 35 years, (Female), W/o Rajesh Sahni 2.

Rekha Devi, aged about 38 years (Female), W/o Binod Sahni Both of resident of Village/Town Lallu Pokhar, P.S-Kashim Bazar, DistrictMunger. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Deep Nishi, Advocates For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 326 and 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 271 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of petty dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties, who are neighbours. There is no injury report on record to corroborate the accusation against petitioner no. 1 who is said to have thrown hot water on the daughter of the informant and no accusation of any assault has been made with respect to the petitioner no. 2. The petitioners are ladies claiming clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23042 of 2019(2) dt.12-04-2019 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 271 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with further conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall be well represented in court on each and every date during trial except as and when directed by the learned court to be physically present, and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T