← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6572/2025disposed

Baukay Rishidev @ Boku Sada v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-29Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6572 of 2025 ====================================================== Baukay Rishidev @ Boku Sada Son of Late Somi Rishidev, Resident of Village- Baisi, Ward No.8, P.S. - Kajain, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, District- Patna. 2.

The Collector, Supaul, District - Supaul.

3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Birpur, District - Supaul. 4.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Birpur, District - Supaul. 5.

The Circle Officer, Raghopur, District - Supaul. 6.

Shekhar Mehto, Son of Late Vinod Mehta, Resident of Village- Baisi Ward No. 4, P.S., P.S. Karjain, District -Supaul.

7.

Sunil Mehta, Son of Late Sita Ram Mehta, Resident of Village- Baisi, P.S. - Karjain, District - Supaul.

8.

Raj Kishore Mehto, Son of Kishundeo Mehta, Resident of Village- Baisi, P.S. - Karjain, District - Supaul.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Birju Prasad, G.P.-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 29-04-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for issuance of a writ in the nature of "Mandamus" commanding and directing the respondent authority to remove encroachment over land of the petitioner bearing Khata no. 434, Khesra No. 1278, Rakawa- 22 decimal,

Patna High Court CWJC No.6572 of 2025(2) dt.29-04-2025 2/2 Mauza-Basi, District- Supaul which has been encroached by the Private Respondent by force and stalling pillar over it;

(ii) for direction to Circle Officer, Raghopur to consider the representation of the petitioner and initiated encroachment case against the Private Respondents and remove the encroachment over the land of the petitioner; (iii) for issuance of any other writ/ writs, order/ orders, direction/directions for which the petitioner is found entitled to.

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be seeking appropriate Forum, both Civil and Criminal for the redressal of the grievance.

4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U