Md. Sagir v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25701 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-512 Year-2019 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Md. Sagir S/O Late Md. Hari Resident Of Simariya, Gordaur, P.S.- Garhbanaili, District- Purnea 2.

Md. Kadir S/O Md. Hadi Resident Of Simariya, Gordaur, P.S.- Garhbanaili, District- Purnea 3.

Md. Tohid S/O Md. Sajir Resident Of Simariya, Gordaur, P.S.- Garhbanaili, District- Purnea 4.

Bibi Nursaba Khatoon S/O Md. Tohid Resident Of Simariya, Gordaur, P.S.- Garhbanaili, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are brother of co-accused Md. Muzaffar. He submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25701 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 2/2 petitioner no. 3 is the husband of petitioner no. 4. He submits that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sadar (Purnea) P.S. Case No. 512 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T