Ram Ekabal Thakur v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19276 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2014 Thana -ARER District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Ram Ekabal Thakur son of Satto Thakur resident of Village - Nagbas, P.S. - Arer, District - Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rinku Thakur, Wife of Ram Ekbal Thakur, resident of Village - Nagbas, P.S. - Arer, District - Madhubani.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dasrath Mehta (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under Sections 498(A), 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioner is the husband of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife. The wife is also ready to live with her husband along with her children provided her husband gives an undertaking to keep her with proper honour and dignity. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below shall enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail for four months after issuing notice to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19276 of 2015 (5) dt.27-11-2015 2/2 informant, on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in Arer P.S. Case No. 62 of 2014.

The court below shall, after issuing notice to the informant, make all efforts for reconciliation of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved amicably between the parties, the provisional bail so granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T