Chandra Bhshan Kumar @ Chadra Bhushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25350 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2025 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Chandra Bhshan Kumar @ Chadra Bhushan kumar S/o- Dinesh Yadav, R/vParanpur Tola Akal Bigha Ps- Belaganj Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. (Dr.) Indiwar Kumari, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 259/25 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 303(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioner assaulted the informant by means of iron rod with an intention to kill, causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is case and counter

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25350 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/3 case between the parties arising out of same incidence and due to land dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight in whch both the sides sustained injuries. The injury sustained by the informant has been opined by the doctor to be simple in nature. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR, I find that there is case and counter case between the parties arising out of same incidence and the injury sustained by the informant has been found to be simple in nature. I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya / Concerned Court in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 259/25, subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25350 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T