Jawed Alam @ Jawed @ Md. Jawed v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31400 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2022 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== 1.

Jawed Alam @ Jawed @ Md. Jawed Son Of Sadre Alam Resident Of Village - Rahikpur, Ward No.15, P.S. - Sri Nagar, District - Purnea, Bihar 2.

Md. Kaiyum @ Qaiyum @ Md. Kayum Son Of Md. Ayub Resident Of Village - Rahikpur, Ward No.15, P.S. - Sri Nagar, District - Purnea, Bihar ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The accused/petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and apprehending their arrest in connection with K. Nagar (Sri Nagar) P.S. Case No. 493 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 353, 332, 224, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against petitioners is to make out an escape of apprehended accused persons during the police raid and in course of occurrence also caused hurt to police

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31400 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 2/3 personnel and also to deter them to discharge official duties.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that allegation against above named petitioners are very much general and omnibus without attributing any specific overt act and as they were neighbours of the apprehended accused persons, were named in present case without having any connecting material. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioners are of clean antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, as petitioners appear to be part of mob only, let above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with K. Nagar (Sri

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31400 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 3/3 Nagar) P.S. Case No. 493 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Rajeev/- U T