Prem Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.781 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17309 of 2021 ====================================================== Prem Kumar S/o Rama Shankar Sharma Resident of Village- Nadauna, P.O.- Bara, P.S.- Bhagwanganj, District- Patna. At Present Resident of Tilaknagar, Rukanpura, Bailey Road, P.O.- B.V. College, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary namely Sri Chaitanya Prasad, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
Sri Chaitanya Prasad, The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri S.K. Singhal, The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.
Sri Jitendra Kumar, The Director General, Crime Investigation Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5.
Sri Manish Kumar Meena, The Dy. Inspector General, Prison and Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
6.
Sri Manavjot Singh Dhillon, The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 7.
Sri Jitendra Kumar, The Superintendent of Aadarsh Kendriya Kara, Beur, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Madhu Prasun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma(Aag 3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 17-08-2023 Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma undertakes to represent all the Opposite Parties Nos. 1 to 7.
2. The present MJC is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 04.10.2021. Petitioner had submitted representation on 11.10.2021, thereafter, the concerned respondent had passed
Patna High Court MJC No.781 of 2022(4) dt.17-08-2023 2/2 order on 16.08.2023. Even though respondents was required to comply the order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of petitioner's representation dated 11.10.2021, however, respondents had taken time of about two years. There is no application for extension of time before this Court insofar as compliance, therefore, concerned respondent have committed contempt. Hence, they are liable to pay cost of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only). Cost shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of four weeks' from today.
3. Accordingly, the present MJC No. 781 of 2022 stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the adverse orders passed by the concerned respondent. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Arun Kumar Jha, J) abhishekkr/- U