Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24505 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2018 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vishal Kumar S/O Late Ram Janam Ram @ Ram Jatan Ram R/O VillageBoaria, Madhopur, Brasiya, P.S- Sarai, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Rupa Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his minor son aged about five years was playing with another minor aged about eight years and there was a fight in between the two minors, on account of which brother of the minors aged 8 years came and assaulted the son of the informant, when informant intervened, Sunny assaulted the informant by sword causing injury on head while petitioner and Vinod assaulted him by lathi and snatched his locket. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24505 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 next submitted that the entire family members have been implicated in the instant case by the informant only with a view to coerce Sunny into submission. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting the informant by sword on head, is against Sunny, it is next submitted that allegation of snatching locket is ornamental in nature.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 102 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T