← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26098/2026allowed

Nandkishor Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-22Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26098 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2022 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya ====================================================== Nandkishor Kumar S/o- Jaynandan Prasad Yadav Village- Gohildih PSFatehpur Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, petitioner took admission in the concerned High School on the basis of transfer certificate issued by concerned Middle School which appears to be not genuine during the verification of the documents made available by the school. It is alleged that the said admission register and transfer certificate were used for declaration of petitioner as Juvenile before J.J.B., Gaya.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26098 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 Further submission is that at the relevant time, petitioner was minor. The alleged School Leaving Certificate is issued by the concern school and petitioner has no knowledge about the same. Petitioner has never indulged in offence alleged. Petitioner is now a young boy of 23 years having no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of allegation and age of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court concerned within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Gaya Ji in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 132 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T