Rishav Kumar @ Rishu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27833 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2024 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna ====================================================== Rishav Kumar @ Rishu Son Of Late Deepak Prasad Vill-Kazibagh, Old Pranami Mandir, Chaili Taand, Ward No-58, P. S.-Alamganj, Dist-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Bypass P.S. Case No. 112 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 414, 34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 812.16 liters liquor was recovered from truck and car out of which 34.56 liters liquor was recovered from the car of the petitioner. The petitioner was apprehended on spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27833 of 2024(2) dt.09-04-2024 2/3 the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioner is neither owner nor driver of any of the vehicles. The petitioner is a labour who was passing through the place of occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2024 and has got three criminal antecedents in which the petitioner is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 112 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27833 of 2024(2) dt.09-04-2024 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(III) Further condition is that, petitioner shall not commit such type of offence during the course of the trial. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T