Patna High CourtCWJC/18898/2008disposed

Smt.Sangita Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-08-03Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18898 of 2008 ====================================================== Smt. Sangita Devi, Wife of Late Sumir Sharma, Ex- Assistant Teacher at Lakshmi Narayan Sanskrit Uchch Vidyalaya, Bagar, P.S. Sikarhatta, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariate, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Director, Secondary School, Government of Bihar, New Secretariate, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Boring Canal Road, Near Rajapur, Patna.

4. Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Boring Canal Road, Near Rajapur, Patna.

5. The Head Master, Lakshmi Narayan Sanskrit uchcha Vidyalaya, Bagar, Police Station- Sikarhatta, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 03-08-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned AC to AG-14 for the State, learned counsel for the Sanskrit Shiksha Board as well as learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 are present.

The petitioner has claimed payment of family pension.

As per the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State, it transpires that the late husband of the petitioner was not an employee of recognized Sanskrit school and thus no pensionary benefit can be paid to her.

Despite copy of the counter affidavit having

Patna High Court CWJC No.18898 of 2008 (7) dt.03-08-2015 2/2 served on counsel for the petitioner in January and March, 2015, no rejoinder has been filed.

In view of the aforesaid, the Court can only presume that the petitioner does not desire to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T