Raju Chaudhary @ Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24530 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== Raju Chaudhary @ Raju Kumar S/o Late Gorelal Chaudhary Resident of village- Hajaratpur, P.S. Narhat, District- Nawada, State- Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109 and 74 of BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that children while playing went to the door of the brother of the informant, who assaulted the children along with his family members and thereafter it is alleged that Raju assaulted his daughter by Khanti causing injury on shoulder and other accused assaulted his wife and son-in-law.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner and Gorelal Yadav (father of the petitioner) are own brothers and they are having dispute relating to property, as such,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24530 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 the occurrence took place, but then the informant falsely alleges that on account of assaulting the children, the occurrence had taken place. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation, it appears that Raju Chaudhary is alleged to have assaulted Pushpa, daughter of the informant, whose injury is opined to be simple in nature
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into consideration the fact that injury suffered by daughter of the informant (Pushpa) is simple in nature, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T