Nirasa Kumari @ Nirasha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27396 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1318 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.
Nirasa Kumari @ Nirasha Kumari D/O Dhaneshwar Yadav R/O VillageChandrayan Tola, Jori, Ward No.08, P.S- Nauhatta, Distt.- Saharsa. 2.
Amar Kumar Ranjan S/O Shambhu Yadav R/O Village- Chandrayan Tola, Jori, Ward No.08, P.S- Nauhatta, Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Anju Devi Wife of Amar Kumar Ranjan, Daughter of Chandra Shekhar Yadav Resident of Village - Chandrayan Tola Juri Ward No. -08, P.S. - Nauhattah, District - Saharsa, At present Resident of Village - Baliya Simar, P.o.- Kundah, P.S.- Mahishi (Jalai O.P.), Dist.- Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Amarnath Jha , Advocate For the State :
Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP For Opposite Party No. 2:
Mr. Prasom Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant/ Opposite Party No. 2.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 149, 379, 494, 498A and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the dispute between the parties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27396 of 2025(3) dt.24-11-2025 2/3 has been settled through process of mediation and the terms of settlement mutually agreed upon by the parties is kept with the mediator's report at 'Flag-M'.
4. Learned counsel for complainant/Opposite Party No. 2 does not dispute the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners and confirms the fact regarding settlement between the parties.
5. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has already been resolved through the process of mediation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
6. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 1318 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with further condition that the petitioners shall abide by all the terms & conditions, as mentioned in the Memorandum of Agreement dated 04.11.2025 kept at Flag-M, agreed between the parties, failing which, learned Court below shall be at liberty
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27396 of 2025(3) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioners.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T