Pramod Mandal And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23292 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -373 Year- 2013 Thana -GAYGHAT District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Pramod Mandal Son of Baiju Mandal

2. Niranjan Mandal Son of Madan Mandal Both Resident of VillageKalyana, P.S. Gaighat, District-Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Gaighat P.S.Case No. 373 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 448, 376, 511 and 380/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of attempting to commit rape upon the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the main allegation is again one Manoj Mandal, who has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by the court below itself and, as a matter of fact, the whole allegation is false and concocted as earlier also similar type of case has been lodged against the petitioner in which he was granted bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23292 of 2018 (2) dt.19-04-2018 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Petitioner should surrender and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered on the basis of materials available on record. With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U