← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36158/2017bail granted

Kundan Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-08-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36158 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2877 Year- 2015 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Kundan Kumar, Son of Late Arvind Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageGandhar, P.S.- Modanganj (Ghoshi), Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Amrita Vats, Wife of Kundan Kumar, Daughter of Anil Kumar Singh, Resident of Road No. 9, Rajiv Nagar, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, P.O.- Kesharinagar, District- Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2877 (C) of 2015 for the offence instituted under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36158 of 2017 (02) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 2877 (C) of 2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge-XI-cum-A.C..J.M., Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T