Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30061/2024dismissed

Anek Yadav @ Anek Kumar Yadav @ Anik Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-21Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30061 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2023 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Anek Yadav @ Anek Kumar Yadav @ Anik Yadav S/o Ram Vinesh Yadav @ Hakru Yadav @ Ram Dinesh Yadav R/o ward no. 5, Vill - Taralahi, P.S. - Bahadurpur, Distt. - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jagnnath Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Bahadurpur P.S. Case No.216 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under sections 302 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The petitioner and others are accused of committing murder of a person. The petitioner has criminal antecedents also.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no overt act against the petitioner and he is not named in the F.I.R. and therefore, he deserves bail.

5. During investigation, it has come that the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30061 of 2024(2) dt.21-06-2024 2/2 has actively participated in the crime. The petitioner has blocked the road so that the victim could not escape and thereafter, all the accused persons have killed him.

6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has actively participated in the killing of the deceased because of the earlier dispute, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. If there is no substantial progress in the trial, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

7. The observations made hereinabove are only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and the same shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the matter before the trial court.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T