Patna High CourtCWJC/5626/2010dismissed

M/S Jagdamba Ventures Pvt.Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-06-29Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5626 of 2010 ====================================================== M/s. Jagdamba Ventures Private Limited, C-10/11, Patliputra Industrial Area, Patna-13, through its Director Shashi Kant Kanoria, son of Sushil Kant Kanoria, resident of 3A, Sineshwar Palace, East Boring Canal Road, P.S. Buddha Colony, Town & District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Energy, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, through its Chairman.

3. The Finance Controller (Revenue), Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Undertaking, Mangles Road, Patna.

5. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Undertaking (West), Mangles Road, Patna.

6. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Commercial & Revenue, PESU West Circle, Patna.

7. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Patliputra Circle, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suraj Samdarshi For the Respondent/s : AC to SC-8 Mr. Prakash Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4.

29-06-2015 Sri Suraj Samdarshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - 8 as well as Sri Prakash Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 to 7, submits that despite the fact that earlier the case was adjourned for obtaining instruction regarding present status of claim of petitioner, even after best effort, he has not been able to get any instruction and as such, he is not in a position to properly assist the Court.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5626 of 2010 (4) dt.29-06-2015 2/2 In view of the facts & circumstances, the writ petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U