← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29922/2024dismissed

Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-31Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29922 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2023 Thana- PUSA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Aman Kumar Son Of Vijay Kumar Poddar Vijay Kumar Resident Of Village - Mahmada, Police Station - Pusa, District - Samastipur. 2.

Sanni Ram @ Sunni Ram Son Of Arun Ram Resident Of Village - Mahmada, Police Station - Pusa, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Pusa P.S. Case No. 114 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 386, 387 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are said to have demanded extortion from the informant and also fired upon the informant.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners never demanded any extortion from the informant. The petitioner no. 1 has three criminal antecedents whereas petitioner no. 2 has two criminal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29922 of 2024(3) dt.31-07-2024 2/2 antecedents and in all cases they are on bail. The petitioners are in custody since 03.11.2023.

5.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail by contending that they have demanded extortion and fired on the informant. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and the serious allegation levelled against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7.

Accordingly, the application of the petitioners for grant of regular bail is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T