Shymali Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9917 of 2008 ====================================================== Shymali Kumari, wife of Birendra Kumar Singh, resident of village Fajli Ganj near Referal Hospital, Tarapur, P.S. Tarapur, District-Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The District magistrate, Munger

5. the District Programme officer, Munger

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Tarapur, Munger

7. The Mukhiya, Gajipur Gram Panchayat, P.S. Tarapur, District Munger

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gajipur Gram Panchayat, P.S. Tarapur, District Munger .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indeshwari Pd.Mandal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad, SC No. 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-04-2015 Heard Sri Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Raj Nandan Prasad, learned SC No. 9. In the present writ petition petitioner has prayed for quashing of an order contained in letter no. 1785 dated 22.5.2008 passed by the Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme (I.C.D.S.), Government of Bihar, Patna. By the said letter it was decided that relatives of Government servants are not eligible for the post of Anganbari Sevika.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of an order passed by a single bench of this court, the said

Patna High Court CWJC No.9917 of 2008 (3) dt.24-04-2015 2/2 condition has been removed by the State Government. In view of the facts and circumstances particularly the fact that relief, which has been sought for in the present writ petition, as admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, has already been granted, there is no reason to keep the matter pending. If the petitioner so advised, may approach the authority concerned.

In view of changed circumstances, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U