← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25907/2025bail rejected

Ranjeet Paswan @ Naki Paswan @ Anarjeet Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-15Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25907 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ranjeet Paswan @ Naki Paswan @ Anarjeet Paswan Son of Lagandip Paswan Resident of Village- Gauspur Izra PS -Hajipur Sadar District -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Sudha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 70 of 2017 instituted under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 02.03.2017 by the informant, Girja Devi.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that when her husband had gone to the field, the accused persons came and brutally assaulted him by 'Lautha' and he succumbed to the injury on the spot itself. As the neighbours reached, the accused disappeared. This led to the FIR.

4. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court about his innocence, learned APP, Mr. Bharat Bhushan has taken this Court to the learned Sessions Judge's observation to show that charge-sheet has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25907 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 submitted against this petitioner amongst other under section 302/34 of the IPC showing him as an absconder. He as such submits that the entire process stand completed and in that background, he should seek bail.

5. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the point raised by the learned APP, as incorporated in the learned Sessions Judge's order, no case for grant of relief is made out.

6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T