Rajkishore Verma v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46741 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -793 Year- 2013 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ====================================================== Rajkishore Verma, son of Jai Govind Verma, Residence of VillageKhapura, P.S. Paliganj, Dist- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Babita Devi W/o Rajkishore Verma, Resident of Village- Khapura, P.S. Paliganj, Dist- Patna, at present R/village- Heraban Bigaha, P.S.- Parasbigha, Dist- Jehanabad.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-11-2016 Heard Sri Nityanand Neeraj, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, husband of Opp.Party no.2, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail in Complaint Case No.793/2013 registered for the offence under Sections 498(A), 494 of the Indian Penal Code.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that since from the first wife there was no issue, the petitioner solemnized second marriage.

Keeping in view the fact that during the life time of first wife, the petitioner solemnized second marriage as well as the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46741 of 2016 (2) dt.10-11-2016 2/2 allegation under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner being husband of the complainant is not entitled to be released on anticipatory bail.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U T