Adist Kumar Thakur v. State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7095 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Adist Kumar Thakur Son of Late Harish Chandra Thakur Resident of Village- Belmohan, P.S.- Phulparash, District- Madhubani, Presently working as Office Attendant in the Office of Executive Engineer, Flood Control Division, Muzaffarpur.
2.
Md. Abrar Ahmad Son of Late Dost Mohammad Resident of VillageGhunapur, P.S.- Bendusar Buzurg, District- Siwan, Presently working as Office Attendant in the Office of Executive Engineer, Flood Control and Drainage Division, Lalganj, District- Vaishali. 3.
Bipin Kumar Son of Late Ishwar Pandey Resident of Village- Barandi, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda, Presently working as Office Attendant in the Office of Executive Engineer, Drainage Division, Hajipur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department (Flood Control and Drainage), District- Muzaffarpur.
4.
The Superintending Engineer, Flood Control and Drainage Circle, Water Resources Department, District- Muzaffarpur.
5.
The Executive Engineer, Flood Control Division, Water Resources Department, District- Muzaffarpur.
6.
The Executive Engineer, Drainage Division, Water Resources Department, Hajipur, District- Vaishali.
7.
The Executive Engineer, Flood Control and Drainage Division, Water Resources Department, Lalganj, District- Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vasant Vikas, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Vikash Kumar (SC-11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the grievances of the petitioners have already stood redressed during the interregnum period, hence the petitioners do not wish to press the present writ petition.
Patna High Court CWJC No.7095 of 2022(2) dt.20-03-2024 2/2
2. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U