Dhiraj Singh @ Dhiraj Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3289 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2009 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Dhiraj Singh @ Dhiraj Kumar Singh and Ors 2.
Munna Singh Both Sons of Ram Naresh Singh, 3.
Raju Singh S/o Late Shankar Singh, All R/o village- Satasi, P.S.- Isuapur, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Smt. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. On query of the Court with regard to the stage of the case the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite his best endeavours he could not seek instruction from the petitioner or from the deponent of the affidavit. Hence, he is not in a position to inform the Court with regard to the present status of the case..
3. Learned APP for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad submits that the present quashing application has been filed seeking quashing of the order by which discharge application of the petitioners was rejected in the year 2018, it is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3289 of 2018(2) dt.20-12-2023 2/2 also submitted much water has flown and since the petitioner has not contacted the learned counsel for the petitioners that amply demonstrate that either by now the trial is over or the trial must have commenced after framing of charge, as such, the Court should not interfere in the quashing application.
4. Considering the submission made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to entertain the present quashing application.
5. Accordingly, the present quashing application shall stand rejected.
6. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to raise all issues at an appropriate stage in the trial if trial by now has not concluded.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Adnan/- U T