Satendra Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29178 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2024 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Satendra Chaudhary, Gender- Male, aged about 81 years, son of late Sikdev Chaudhary, 2.

Subdhi Devi, Gender- Female, aged about 79 years, wife of Satendra Chaudhary, 3.

Rina Devi, Gender-Female, aged about 38 years, wife of Mukesh Chaudhary, 4.

Pramila Devi @ Kumari Pramil Devi, Gender-Female, aged abaout 29 years, wife of Rakesh Chaudhary, 5.

Rakesh Chaudhary @ Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, Gender- Male, aged about 30 years, son of Satendra Chaudhary, All resident of Village- Majhauli Dih, P.S- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Bidupur PS Case No.58 of 2024 dated 02.02.2024, instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 308, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners is that all the petitioners came at the door of the informant and started abusing her. When she protested, all the accused persons assaulted her by means of lathi and iron rod. It is alleged that the informant sustained head injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29178 of 2024(2) dt.15-05-2024 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against any of the petitioners, rather, the allegation is general and omnibus. Further submission is that from the injury report of the informant it is clear that she sustained simple injury caused by hard and blunt substance. It is also submitted that both the parties are agnates. The petitioners have clean antecedents.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in Bidupur PS Case No.58 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Khatim Reza, J) J. Alam/- U T