← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23985/2019dismissed

Kundan Kumar @ Sundar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-17Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23985 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2017 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Kundan Kumar @ Sundar Kumar, aged about 35 years, Gender-Male, Son of Late Siddheshwar Rai @ Singashwar Ray, Resident of Village -Teja Bigha, Police Station Bakhtiyarpur, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party:

Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 325 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of petty quarrel and the occurrence transpired due to sudden provocation. As such, the ingredients of Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code are not made out against the petitioner, who claims clean antecedents. It is further submitted that in any event, the injuries sustained by the son of the informant are simple in nature.

4. Having regard to the nature of accusations, gravity of offence alleged and considering the specific accusation of assault with fasuli by the petitioner as also the injury report which does not disclose the nature of the injury rather the patient has been referred to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23985 of 2019(2) dt.17-04-2019 2/2 Department of Surgery Orthopedic Emergency, NMCH for X-Ray, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T