Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29975/2017bail granted

Basudeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-26Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29975 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -266 Year- 2016 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ====================================================== Basudeo Yadav, son of late Akal Yadav, resident of village- Dhandh, P.S. and District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 26-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jamui P.S. Case No.266 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B/34 Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that husband of the deceased is already in custody. Petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No.266 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29975 of 2017 (3) dt.26-07-2017 2/2 bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and

(3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T