Jitendra Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37045 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYGHAT District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Jitendra Yadav, son of Chandeshwar Yadav.
2. Bijnesh Devi, wife of Jitendra Yadav. Both are Residents of VillageJagniya, P.S. Gayghat, District Muzaffarpur.
3. Arun Rai, son of Garib Rai. null
4. Satahu Rai, son of Sawaroop Rai.
5. Deva Rai @ Devu Rai son of Late Yadu Rai. 3 to 5 are Resident of Village- Mishraulia, P.S. Gayghat, District Muzaffarpur.
6. Sanjay Rai, son of Awadhesh Rai.
7. Singheshwar Rai, son of Shatrudhan Rai.
8. Bachhu Rai @ Buchhy Rai, son of Bigan Rai. null
9. Umesh Rai, son of Awadhesh Rai. No. 6 to 9 are Resident of VillageHarkhauli, P.S. Gayghat, District- Muzaffarpur.
10. Md. Jinnat, son of Md. Waziuddin. null
11. Md. Tablak, son of Md. Athar Hussain. Both are Resident of VillageTurkauliya, P.S. Gayghat, District Muzaffarpur.
12. Sita Ram Rai, son of Yogendra Roy Resident of Village- Balua, P.S. Katra, District Muzaffarpur.
13. Dhaneshwar Rai, son of Ramashish Rai. null
14. Bindeshwar Rai @ Malhu son of Ramashish Rai.
15. Chandeshwar Rai son of Ramashish Rai. No. 13 to 15 are Resident of Village- Bhawani Pur, P.S. Katra, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamal Kishore Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Gayghat P.S. Case No. 47 of 2017 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 324, 427, 325, 307, 353, 504 and 506 of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37045 of 2017 (3) dt.12-09-2017 2/2 the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. They have falsely been implicated in this case due to political reasons.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in connection with Gayghat P.S. Case No. 47 of 2017 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- U T