← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18140/2013dismissed

Gangeshwar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-01-17Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18140 of 2013 ====================================================== Gangeshwar Sharma Son Of Late Ram Charan Singh Resident Of VillageWaina, Police Station- Ghosi In The District Of Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director General And Inspector General Of Police, Bihar, Patna 4.

The Inspector General Of Police Head Quarter, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Nivedita Nirvikar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2023

1. The petitioner claims grant of A.C.P. on completion of 12 years to 24 years of service.

2. The respondents have filed the reply and pointed out that the petitioner was initially appointed as a Steno SubInspector in the year, 1969. He was thereafter posted as Police Sub Inspector in the year, 1973. He was promoted as Police Inspector on 23.09.1981 and was further promoted as Dy. S.P. on 04.03.1999. Thus, he has already received two promotions during his service and, therefore, as per the Bihar State Employees Condition (Assured Career Progression Scheme) Rules, 2003, the petitioner cannot be said to be entitled to benefit of first A.C.P. The benefit has, therefore, been denied to

Patna High Court CWJC No.18140 of 2013(2) dt.17-01-2023 2/2 the petitioner.

3. This Court, does not find any error in the decision of the respondents in not granting first A.C.P. to the petitioner, as he already stood promoted twice during the period.

4. The writ petition is mis-conceived and accordingly dismissed.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Pravinkumar/- Item No. 52 U