← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18171/2013dismissed

Ranjit Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-01-17Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18171 of 2013 ====================================================== 1.

Ranjit Kumar and Ors Son Of Sri Ram Chandra Choudhary Resident Of Village- Barara, P.S.- Noor Sarai, District- Nalanda 2.

Mithlesh Kumar Sindhiaya Son Of Sri Diljeet Prasad Resident Of VillageMandech, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda 3.

Kamlesh Kumar Son Of Sri Arjun Prasad Resident Of Village- Barara, P.S.- Noor Sarai, District- Nalanda 4.

Amit Kumar Son Of Sri Ramayan Prasad Singh Resident Of VillageDhaurani Tola, Mokama, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna 3.

The Chairman Constable Selection Board, Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura 4.

The Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Nawada, District- Nawada 5.

The Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Patna, District- Patna 6.

The Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Patna Rail Police, Patna 7.

The Chairman Constable Selection Board, Jamui, Dist- Jamui 8.

The Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Begusarai, District- Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kr No.2, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2023

1. Heard the parties.

2. The matter relates to the selection conducted under the advertisement of 2004 for the post of Constable. The petitioners claims right of appointments against the left over vacancy under the said advertisement.

3. After almost 18 years no such relief can be granted

Patna High Court CWJC No.18171 of 2013(2) dt.17-01-2023 2/2 to the petitioners as selection process can not be continued for such a long period. The writ petition by efflux of time has become infructuous.

4. This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Pravinkumar/- Item No. 56 U