Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25399/2025withdrawn

Sipahi Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-30Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25399 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2024 Thana- AKILPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Sipahi Rai Son of Sri Harvansh Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, Dist- Patna 2.

Dinesh Rai son of Shri Harvansh Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, Dist- Patna 3.

Radhe Shyam Rai @ Radha Rai son of Raghu Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, Dist- Patna 4.

Ramlakhan Rai @ Lakhan Rai son of Shivnath Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, Dist- Patna 5.

Nirekhan Rai son of Late Shivpujan Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, Dist- Patna 6.

Surendra Rai Son of Late Dashrath Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, Dist- Patna 7.

Booti Rai @ Booti Lal Son of Shri Harvansh Rai village- Habaspurdera, PsShahpur, Dist- Patna 8.

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Rai son of Raghu Rai village- Habaspurdera, PsShahpur, Dist- Patna 9.

Birbal Rai Son of Ramanand Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, DistPatna 10.

Bachchu Rai Son of Harvansh Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, DistPatna 11.

Manish Kumar @ Vakil Rai Son of Late Ganesh Rai village- Habaspurdera, Ps- Shahpur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 Heard Mr. Raj Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25399 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/2 petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file fresh application.

3. Permission is granted.

4. With the aforesaid liberty, the bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Office is directed to handover copy of impugned order and copy of FIR to the learned counsel for the petitioners. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T