Patna High CourtCWJC/13175/2007disposed

Mohammad Aslam v. The State Of Bihar Andors

2015-02-05Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13175 of 2007 ====================================================== Mohammad Aslam, son of Md. Fakhruddin, resident of "Darul Gheyas", Near Hotel Blue Diamond, Jamun Gali, Sabzi Bagh, Patna - 800004, P.S. - Pirbahore, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Rajyabhasha Department, Urdu Directorate, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Rajyabhasha Department, Urdu Directorate, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Secretary to the Government, Minority Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director (Urdu), Rajyabhasha Department, Urdu Directorate, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

6. The Additional District Magistrate, Madhepura-cum-Enquiry Officer, Madhepura.

7. The Deputy Collector-cum-Block Development Officer, Singheshwar, Madhepura.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akashdeep Mr. Shyameshwar Kr.Singh For the Respondent/s : AC to GA-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

05-02-2015 Learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate - 8 intends to file counter affidavit. He may file it in office. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of facts disclosed in the counter affidavit, particularly; Annexure - „13‟, this petition may be disposed of with an indication that in view of exoneration of the petitioner from the departmental proceeding, vide Annexure -„13‟, the respondents may consider to grant consequential benefits.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13175 of 2007 (2) dt.05-02-2015 2/2 It goes without saying that in view Annexure „13‟ to the counter affidavit, the petitioner is entitled to consequential benefits. The respondents may take appropriate decision in accordance with law in the light of Annexure „13‟ preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U