← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26674/2023bail granted

Sanjay Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-24Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26674 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2022 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sanjay Pandey Son Of Suresh Pandey R/V- Sohagi, Ps- Nasriganj, DistRohtas At Sasaram. At Present Address As R/V- Flat No. 44, Body CoOperative Coloney Bokaro, P.S- Bokaro, Dist- Bokaro (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Arun Kumar Tiwari Son Of Sri Ram Tiwari R/V- Mohalla- Fazalganj, PsSasaram, Dist- Rohtas At Sasaram ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is brother-in-law (bhainsur) of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26674 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/3 victim. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. case No. 190 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The petitioner is directed to co-operate during the trial. If the petitioner does not co-operate during the trial, the Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26674 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 3/3 make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the Court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/Nitin U T