Sonu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23046 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2019 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sonu Rai aged about 26 years (Male) Son of Jitendra Rai Resident of Village Maidapur, P.S.- Kudhani, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Kunwar Ajit Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 447, 323, 307, 324, 302, 188, 354 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Kudhani (Turki OP) P.S. Case No. 74 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated due to village politics. The accusation is general and omnibus. Except being named in the FIR, there is no accusation of committing any offence whatsoever against the petitioner, who claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-3rd, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Kudhani (Turki OP) P.S. Case No. 74 of 2019,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23046 of 2019(2) dt.12-04-2019 2/2 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with further conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T