Shaffir Ansari @ Saffir Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26501 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2020 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== SHAFFIR ANSARI @ SAFFIR ANSARI S/O LATE SAJJAD ANSARI Resident of Village- Pachrukhi, P.S.- Khizarsarai, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prithivi Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 30-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the husband of the informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that in this respect good sense has been prevailed between the parties and in support of this Annexure-2 is annexed with this petition. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.09.2020.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26501 of 2023(4) dt.30-08-2023 2/2 application for bail and submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR and deceased is the father of the petitioner. As per postmortem report, the doctor opined that the death was caused by firearms injury, which corroborates the prosecution case. During investigation several witnesses have also supported the prosecution case.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
7. The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within its stipulated time, which is mentioned in its status report. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U