Ram Udit Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2113 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20826 of 2010 ====================================================== Ram Udit Singh, son of Late Ram Briksha Singh, resident of Harnaut Bazar, Ranchi Road, Opposite State Dispensary, At & Post Office - Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

.... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Industrial Development Commissioner, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Managing Director, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna.

3. The Deputy Manager, I/C Zone - III, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna.

4. The Branch Manager, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Nalanda Branch, at and post Office, District - Nalanda.

5. The Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, Central Bank of India, Exhibition Road, Patna.

6. The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, At and Post Office - Harnaut, District - Harnaut.

7. Prem Chand Prasad C/o - New Durga Vastralaya, Harnaut Bazar, At and Post Office - Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

8. Nawal Kishore Sahu @ Nand Kishore Prasad Sahu C/o - New Durga Vastralaya, Harnaut Bazar, At and Post Office - Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

9. Ranjan Kumar C/o - New Durga Vastralaya, Harnaut Bazar, At and Post Office - Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

10. Smt. Bachi Singh @ Bachi Devi W/o - Jagdish Singh resident of Village - Shri Chandpur, Post Office - Harnaut, District - Nalanda. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : Mr. Dipak Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Ajay, G.A.-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 25-01-2016 Heard Mr. Dipak Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant, and Mr. Ajay, learned Government Advocate No.12, appearing on behalf of the State

Patna High Court LPA No.2113 of 2015 (7) dt.25-01-2016 2/2 respondents.

After some arguments, Mr. Dipak Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to approach the competent authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the appellant. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this appeal is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the appellant to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Sunil/- U