Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35804 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2021 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== MANISH KUMAR S/o Rajballabh Yadav @ Rajavalabh Yadav R/o villageJahir Bigha, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, the petitioner was apprehended with stolen motor cycle.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. The petitioner has got no concern with the stolen motor cycle and he has taken the vehicle from his cousin, Mithu Kumar. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and is in custody since 16.02.2021 and investigation in this case is complete Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35804 of 2021(2) dt.16-09-2021 2/2 Considering the facts of the case and the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Rampur PS case No. 51/2021 on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/ her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T