Jitendra Singh @ Jitendar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38196 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2023 Thana- LALIT NARAYAN UNIVERSITY District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Jitendra Singh @ Jitendar Singh Son Of Tirthraj Singh @ Trith Raj Singh Resident Of Village- Bhawanipur, Po- Sithen Kulaparu, Ps- Mara Khas, DisttPrayagraj Manda Allahabad, Up ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandeshwar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 27-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with L.N.M.U. P.S. Case No.361 of 2023, lodged on 27.11.2023, under Sections 406/420/379/511/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, the petitioner was caught by the security when the petitioner and another were making interpolation in the ATM machine and petitioner had been apprehended from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2023 having no criminal antecedent. Counsel submits that charge sheet

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38196 of 2024(2) dt.27-05-2024 2/2 against the petitioner has already been filed in this case.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that from the content of the FIR it is clear that he was apprehended at the place of occurrence.

6. Upon the specific query of the Court that whether charges have been framed or not. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as per his knowledge charge has not been framed.

7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner, above named, be granted bail only after framing of the charge, if not framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-V, Darbhanga, in connection with L.N.M.U. P.S. Case No.361 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T