← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29081/2025bail granted

Premavtar Bharti @ Firoz Bharti@ Firoz Bhari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-10Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29081 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - BIRAUL AT BENIPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Premavtar Bharti @ Firoz Bharti@ Firoz Bhari S/o Late Ram Awatar Bharti R/o Village- Maheshpur, P.S.- Maheshpur, Distt- Pakur, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kalpna Kumari W/o Premavtar Bharti @ Firoz Bharti, D/o Vishvambar Paswan R/o Vill- Maheshpur, P.S.- Maheshpur, Dist- Pakur (Jharkhand), at present Vill- Gyashpur, P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, Distt- Darbhanga ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Patel, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP For the Complainant :

Mr. Vinay Kr. Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Biraul Complaint Case No. 151 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 341, 323, 379, 498(A), 504 and 506 of the IPC.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 16.09.2025, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties and therefore, the mediation failed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29081 of 2025(4) dt.10-12-2025 2/2 present case. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. He has submitted further that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Biraul, Darbhanga in connection with Biraul Complaint Case No. 151 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./ 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

7. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2 (the complainant). The interim maintenance granted by this Court shall be subject to adjustment, if any other court grants maintenance to the opposite party no. 2.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T