Birendra Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13216 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -408 Year- 2017 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Birendra Ravidas S/o Mushari Ravidas, R/o Village- Phatana, P.S.- Nagar Thana, District- Nawada (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nawada P.S.Case No.408 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 7 of the E.C. Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that when his P.D.S. shop was inspected, the 51.20 quintal of wheat and 62.30 quintal of rice were found missing.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that at the time of inspection the petitioner was on way and his son was there, as such he could not show those articles which were kept in another room and thereafter he sold the same. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13216 of 2018 (2) dt.05-04-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Nawada in connection with Nawada P.S.Case no.408 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T