Patna High CourtCWJC/8987/2011disposed

Kirtya Nand Mandal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-26Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8987 of 2011 ====================================================== Kirtya Nand Mandal son of Late Ram Nath Mandal resident of village Manjhli, P.O.-Hathi, Police Station-Asarganj, District -Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Govt. Of Bihar New Secretariat, Patna

3. Director, Secondary Education Bihar, Patna

4. District Education Officer, Bhagalpur

5. The Bihar School Examination Board, (S.S.) Through Its Secretary, Patna

6. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (S.S.) Patna

7. Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (S.S.) Patna

8. Governing Body Of Khublal Mahabir College, Belari Asarganj, Bhagalpur Through Its Secretary

9. The President Of Governing Body Of The College Khublal Mahabir College, Belari Asarganj, Bhagalpur

10. The Secretary Khubala Mahabir College, Belari Asarganj Bhagalpur

11. The Principal Khublal Mahabir College, Belari Asarganj, Bhagalpur

12. Jai Prakash Ram Das Lecturer, Department of Logic, Khublal Mahabir College, Belari Asarganj, Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-02-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of objection raised through the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 5 to 7 makes a prayer for disposal of the present writ petition so that the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy. This prayer was made in presence of learned AC to SC No. 21,

Patna High Court CWJC No.8987 of 2011 (6) dt.26-02-2016 2/2 Sri S.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent / Bihar School Examination Board and learned counsel for the private respondent.

In view of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy.

It is declared that period consumed by the petitioner while pursuing the present petition i.e. from 17.5.2011 till date shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U