Pradeep Kumar @ Pradip Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28172 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-672 Year-2022 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== PRADEEP KUMAR @ PRADIP YADAV SON OF BAIJNATH YADAV @ VAIJANATH YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KHARNE, P.S.- BARACHATTI, DISTRICT - GAYA.

... ... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No2 , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. On the alleged date a and time of occurrence when the informant Pappu Manjhila was going to his village by motorcycle bearing registration No. BR-02AA-3145, this petitioner along with other co-accused persons surrounded him near Panchavahini river and snatched his motorcycle and Rs., 5000/- and fled away towards village- Patti.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28172 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 2/2

4. It is submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named in the FIR. He next submits that allegation against the petitioner is that he snatched the the motorcycle of informant. The witnesses have supported the prosecution case.

6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation, prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Kaushik/- U T