Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18133 of 2015 ======================================================
1. Anil Kumar Singh, Son of Naresh Singh, resident of Nababganj, P.S. Manihari, Distt. - Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea
2. The Deputy Director, Panchayati Raj, Purnea Division, Purnea
3. The District Magistrate, Katihar
4. The Director District Rural Development Authority, Katihar
5. The Programme officer, Manihari, P.S. Manihari, Distt. - Katihar
6. Pradeep Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ghoneshwar Singh, Sitting Mukhiya of Nababganj, P.S. Manihari, Distt. - Katihar
7. The Panchayat Rojgar Sevak, P.S. Manihari, Distt. - Katihar
8. The Panchayat Technical Assistant P.S. Manihari, District Katihar
9. The Junior Engineer, MANREGA, P.S. Manihari, Distt. - Katihar .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath- AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 27-01-2016 Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, learned Additional Advocate General No. 3, appearing for the respondents. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
Patna High Court CWJC No.18133 of 2015 (2) dt.27-01-2016 To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U