Sipahi Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46278 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2012 Thana -KESARIA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) =========================================================== Sipahi Mahto, Son of Late Ranjit Mahto, Resident of Village - Dilman Chhapra, P.O. and P.S. Kesaria, District.-East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. U.L. Verma, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is seeking quashing of the order dated 15.09.2014 passed by learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari in S.Tr.No.398/13 by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge has rejected the petition dated 15.6.2013 filed by the petitioner under Section 228 Cr.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order has been passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge without applying his judicious mind and without any material on record.

This Court has perused the impugned order. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46278 of 2014 dt.11-10-2017 learned Additional Sessions Judge has given reasons and the materials on the basis of which he has taken a view rejecting the application of the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order.

The application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 14.10.2017 Transmission Date 14.10.2017