Dr. Indal Singh Nivin R.K.P.L.D. Kisan College Bariyarpur, Sitamarhi And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3755 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21182 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Dr. Indal Singh Nivin R.K.P.L.D. Kisan College Bariyarpur, Sitamarhi through its Principal, Kaushal Kishore Singh

2. Kaushal Kishore Singh Son of Sri Rajendra Singh At Present Principal, Dr. Indal Singh Navin R.K.P.L.D. Kisan College, Bariyarpur, Sitamarhi, P.S. & District-Sitamarhi .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Shri R.K.Mahajan, Principal Secretary to the Government, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Shri Ram Bhujawan Choudhary, Director, Bihar Secondary School Examination (Higher Secondary), Patna.

4. Shri Bishen Patel, Hon'ble Minister of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. Bihar School Examination Board, Patna through its Secretary, Shri Niwas Chandra Tiwari .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Partha Sarthy. GA XI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 05-01-2018 On 14.09.2012, C.W.J.C. No. 21182 of 2011 was disposed off by this Court and the only direction issued was based on report submitted by the Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board on 30.12.2011. A final decision in the matter was taken. Now, from the show cause filed by opposite parties 2 and 3, it is seen that by Annexure 'A', a final decision has been taken.

Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the decision taken is not proper, the consideration is for the limited academic year.

Counsel for the petitioner vehemently argues that the dispute has not been resolved with regard to issue involved in the writ petition and, therefore, the decision is not up-to-the

Patna High Court MJC No.3755 of 2014 (6) dt.05-01-2018 2/2 satisfaction.

If that be so, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file representation in accordance with law before an appropriate forum that the decision is taken deliberately and illegally, which can not be decided by this Court. Accordingly, this application stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file representation afresh in accordance with law.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) SA/- U