Patna High CourtMJC/3877/2014disposed

Jeevanand Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-29The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3877 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20041 of 2013 ====================================================== Jeevanand Mishra Son of Late Vishwanath Mishra Resident of Village -Kachhua, P.S.- Lakhnaur, District - Madhubani at present C/o- Sri Bhakti Nath Mishra, Qr. No. III, 29, C.M.P.F. Colony, Dhanbar Post Office and District - Dhanbad - 826001 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary -cumSecretary, Human Resources Development Department, Patna

2. Dr. Mohammad Ishtiag, Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya

3. Sri D.K. Yadav, Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya

4. Sri Brajesh Rai, Pension Officer cum- Pension Incharge, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya

5. Sri B.N. Ojha, Principal, B.D. College, Mithapur, Patna

6. Sri H.R. Srinivasa, Director, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the University :

Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anay Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 24 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Show-cause has been filed by the University indicating that entire payment has been made to the petitioner. The petitioner and his counsel are not present. Keeping in view the show-cause filed by the University indicating settlement of petitioner's claim vide notification Annexure-A dated 16.09.2015, Pension Payment Order issued thereafter vide Annexure-B on 16.09.2015, payment of arrears to the petitioner, as is evident from Annexure-C dated 16.09.2015 and the documents indicating payment made to the

Patna High Court MJC No.3877 of 2014(7) dt.29-11-2017 2/2 petitioner, now no further indulgence into the matter is called for. In case the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting after settlement of his claim as is indicated by the University in the show-cause filed today, the petitioner may challenge the same afresh in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, for the present, finding no indulgence to be made, the application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.