Patna High CourtMJC/439/2006dismissed

Kumar Kant Lal And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-14Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.439 of 2006 ======================================================

1. Kumar Kant Lal, son of Late Hare Krishna Lal, resident of VillageHaripatti, P.S. Raj Nagar, District- Madhubani.

2. Harendra Pratap Singh, son of Late Raghuvar Dayal Singh, resident of Mohalla Adarsh Colony, Pashchimi Patel Nagar, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Town and District- Patna.

3. Ramnendra Kumar Sinha, son of Late Dr. Rameshwar Prasad, resident of Village- Rampur, P.S. Kesaria, District- East Champaran.

4. Ajay Kumar Mishra, son of Late Gajanand Mishra, resident of Village Kharia Dasti, P.S. Araria Court, District- Araria.

5. Krishna Chandra Jha, son of Late Dukh Mohan Jha, resident of VillageKasrour, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner and Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.

2. Shri V. Jai Shankar, name of father not known to the petitioner, Commissioner and Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.

3. Shri Sriram Pandey, name of father not known to the petitioners, Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.

4. Shri Sachidanand Sah, name of father not known to the petitioners, Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.

5. Shri Ganga Prasad, name of father not known to the petitioner, Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Darbhanga.

6. Shri Samsul Hassan, name of father not known to the petitioners, Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishwa Nath Ram, Advocate Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, A.C. to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the contempt petition is rendered infructuous.

Dismissed as infructuous.

(Hemant Gupta, ACJ) P.K.P.