Kalinda Devi @ Kalindi Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28780 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2021 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Kalinda Devi @ Kalindi Devi Son Of Suresh Ram Resident Of Village - Akil Tola, P.S.- Maharajganj, Distt.- Siwan.
2.
Mala Kumari D/O Suresh Ram Resident Of Village - Akil Tola, P.S.- Maharajganj, Distt.- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertake to remove the defects, in any, within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioners are said to have killed the daughter of the informant by hanging.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28780 of 2022(4) dt.05-12-2022 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation leveled against the petitioners. He submits that petitioner No. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is Nanad of the informant's daughter. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. However, learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submits that petitioners are also involved in this case.
Having regards to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on their behalf is hereby rejected.
Accordingly this application is dismissed.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) guddukr/- U T