Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24239 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2020 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Son of Sribhagwan Yadav Residence of Village - Ranipur, Police Station - Barharia, District - Siwan ... Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Shambhu Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through Video Conferencing.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273/308 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 30a and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
16 liters of Mahua wine was recovered from a plastic bag kept on petitioner's cycle.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has nothing to do with the alleged recovery. Petitioner is in custody since 13.5.2020. Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24239 of 2020(2) dt.22-09-2020 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge II cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Siwan in Siwan Mufasil Police Station Case No. 203/2020 on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T